AI stopped answering. It started acting.
Assistants file tickets, move money, and message citizens. Agents call tools on their own. Every one of those is a decision your organization owns, whether you saw it or not.
AI governance & assurance
One inline chokepoint governs every AI output and every agent action: allow, block, or escalate, in milliseconds, with a tamper-evident record an auditor can verify years later. Not a dashboard that watches. A sentry that acts, and proves it.
Deterministic core. Runs air-gapped with no external AI service. Milliseconds, not seconds, because there is no LLM in the hot path.
// the AI was about to output:
"Your card 4111 1111 1111 1111 is on file."
// POST /v1/govern responded:
{
"verdict": "block",
"delivered": false,
"triggered_controls": ["eu-ai-act:art-10", "eu-ai-act:art-12"],
"detectors": [{ "detector": "pii", "flagged": true }]
}
// the stored record is redacted + hash-chained:
"output_redacted": "Your card [REDACTED:CREDIT_CARD] is on file."
Assistants file tickets, move money, and message citizens. Agents call tools on their own. Every one of those is a decision your organization owns, whether you saw it or not.
The EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO/IEC 42001 all ask the same question: show us how each decision was controlled. "We have a policy PDF" is not an answer. Logs you can edit are not evidence.
A leaked ID number, a fabricated legal citation, a prompt-injected agent with payment access. The cost of the thousandth output failing is not covered by the first 999 going fine.
How it works
Before your AI's output reaches a user, or before your agent executes a tool call, send it to /v1/govern. One HTTP call with a scoped, revocable key.
A deterministic detector floor screens for leaked personal data, fabricated citations, prompt injection, unsafe content, excessive agency, and coverage gaps. No cloud LLM in the hot path. Critical findings block; uncertainty escalates to a human. It fails closed, never open.
Every decision lands in an append-only, hash-chained log: redacted, encrypted, explainable, and mapped to the exact controls it satisfies. Tampering is mathematically detectable. Erasure is crypto-shredding that leaves the chain verifiable.
One platform, three planes
Eight detectors, English and Arabic, screen every output inline: personal data (with redaction spans), verifiable-claim checking against a curated offline legal registry, prompt injection, safety, uncertainty abstention, and fairness tagging.
The differentiator. Decisions are not just logged, they are mapped to controls in six versioned frameworks. Live conformity posture, per-control evidence, one-click Annex IV core export, drift gates, and Article 73 incident workflows.
Agents submit proposed tool calls before executing them. Tool allow-lists block unknown tools, privilege-scope checks catch overreach, parameter-risk screening flags dangerous arguments. Turrigan authorizes the decision to act. It never executes anything itself.
Evidence, not assertions
Ask any AI vendor how they will support your next audit. Then ask them to prove a log entry was never edited. Turrigan's decision log is hash-chained and signed into verifiable checkpoints: any edit, deletion, or reorder is detected, with the exact break position.
Sovereignty is a feature
Fastest start. Your tenant, your keys, your encrypted data, our operations. Physical database isolation available per tenant.
Bring your own datastore: the decision log lives in a database you host and own. The connection secret is sealed at rest. Walk away with your data any day.
The deterministic floor needs no external AI service at all. Government and regulated deployments run fully on-premises, offline, with customer-managed keys and crypto-shredding.
Read this before any vendor demo
No tool can. Compliance is an organizational outcome. Turrigan produces the per-decision evidence and controls infrastructure that makes your compliance case provable instead of aspirational.
Our disparate-impact screening surfaces signals worth investigating, population-level and honest about its limits. Anyone selling you push-button fairness certification is selling you risk.
This honesty is not modesty. It is the product. An assurance layer that inflates its own coverage is worse than none, so every posture Turrigan reports is one an independent auditor can reproduce. The evidence infrastructure has passed an independent technical review against the EU AI Act, alongside adversarial reviews across the detector floor. Formal notified-body certification remains a separate, later step, and we will never pretend otherwise.
For your engineers
Keep your models, your vendors, your stack. Governance is one HTTP call in the path you already control, with typed schemas for every response in the interactive API reference.
curl https://api.turrigan.com/v1/govern \
-H "X-API-Key: trg_..." \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"input": "user question",
"output": "candidate AI answer",
"profile": "customer-support"
}'
# → {"verdict": "allow", "delivered": true, ...}
We are onboarding a small number of design partners: a free, time-boxed pilot on a dedicated, isolated tenant, with a scoped key and your data in a database that can be handed to you or cryptographically shredded when it ends. You keep the evidence either way.
Tell us what your AI does and what a bad day looks like. We will tell you honestly whether Turrigan helps. Pilot scope and terms are confirmed in writing before onboarding; nothing here is a binding offer.